AISIs’ Roles in Domestic and International Governance

AISIs’ Roles in Domestic and International Governance

December 7, 2024

Marta Ziosi, Claire Dennis, Robert Trager, Simeon Campos, Ben Bucknall, Charles Martinet, Adam L. Smith, Merlin Stein

The AI Safety Institutes (AISIs) – and other institutions that may play similar roles, such as the Chinese AI Safety Network and Unit A3 of the EU AI Office – are increasingly important actors in the governance of advanced AI. The Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative (AIGI) recently convened a small expert workshop – held under the Chatham House rule – to explore the role that AISIs could play both domestically and internationally. Attendees suggested a wide variety of functions AISIs can fulfil, including roles as evaluators of models, developers of standards, and coordinators of third parties, and noted that a network of AISIs might coordinate these efforts internationally. This memo summarises the key takeaways, questions, and tradeoffs which emerged from the workshop about AISIs’ structure and functions. These include: conducting evaluations, participation in standards development, coordination with regulatory bodies, classified material and information-sharing, ability to coordinate internationally, the potential formation of regional AISIs, and AISI contributions to the international scientific report on AI safety.‍

Image for Chain-of-Thought Is Not Explainability

Chain-of-Thought Is Not Explainability

July 15, 2025
Image for Mapping Industry Practices to the EU AI Act’s GPAI Code of Practice Safety and Security Measures

Mapping Industry Practices to the EU AI Act’s GPAI Code of Practice Safety and Security Measures

July 11, 2025